Showing posts with label Human Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Human Rights. Show all posts

Singapore gays allowed a step forward, but pushed two back

By Sonia Kolesnikov-Jessop

Published: Thursday, August 2, 2007

SINGAPORE — In a city-state that reserves the right to control public expression and private sexual behavior, these have been interesting weeks for the emerging gay rights movement.

Last month, the Singapore Media Development Authority allowed "Happy Ending - Asian Boys Vol. 3," a new play on gay themes by a local playwright, Alfian Sa'at, to be staged uncensored. It was seen by more than 6,000 people in its 23-day run and drew praise from a visiting British film actor and well-known gay rights advocate, Ian McKellen, among others.

But this week, the same authority denied licenses to two art exhibitions that had been planned for the third annual Singapore gay pride festival, IndigNation, which began Wednesday: an exhibition by Alex Au that was to show 80 photos of same-sex couples kissing, and a pencil drawing by Genevieve Chua depicting two nude women in a suggestive sexual position.

In a letter explaining its refusal to license the photo exhibit, the authority said that while homosexual-themed content was permissible in an "appropriate context," it should not be of a "promotional or exploitative nature."

"Hence we have allowed brief same-sex kissing in plays and in R21-rated films. But the proposed exhibition (comprising 80 color photographs), which mainly focuses on homosexual kissing, is deemed to promote a homosexual lifestyle and cannot be allowed," it said.

Although homosexuals in Singapore have become slightly more visible in recent years, few have been willing to take public stances on gay rights. Despite some signs that the government might be rethinking the issue, gay sex remains a criminal act under Section 377A of the Singapore penal code, and many are unsure how far they can push the debate.

In April, Lee Kuan Yew, the founding prime minister of modern Singapore, referred to homosexuality as "genetic" - an announcement some people seized on as an indication that the government might move toward liberalization.

At a public forum last month organized to coincide with the opening performances of "Happy Ending," a lawmaker, Baey Yam Keng of the ruling People's Action Party, argued that if Section 377A was reviewed in Parliament, members should be freed from the obligation to vote strictly along party lines, in order to encourage a "very open debate and open expression of opinion."

At the same forum, the Reverend Yap Kim Hao, a former Methodist bishop, said he thought the law should be repealed. The National Council of Churches of Singapore said that Yap was not speaking on its behalf.

"Happy Endings" is the final play in a trilogy by Sa'at that began in 2000 with "Asian Boys Vol. 1." In the years since that first installment was performed, Singapore has loosened some of its restrictions on sex, both heterosexual and homosexual.

The government now lets gays serve openly in the civil service and allows a small number of gay bars, saunas and other businesses to flourish in certain parts of the city. In 2001, the government gave the green light to the first outdoor party for gays in Singapore. In ensuing years, though, the party got bigger, and in 2005 it was denied a license. Organizers moved it to Bangkok.

Last year, the government announced plans to decriminalize heterosexual oral and anal sex between consenting men and women, but made clear that the ban on homosexual sex would remain intact. However, the Home Affairs Ministry said it would not be "proactive" in enforcing the ban when it came to consensual acts taking place in private.

Sa'at said that with "Happy Ending" he wanted to confront issues that he was "at most alluding to" in the first two plays.

"The first was almost apolitical because it used a lot of camp aesthetic, and there was a lot of hide-and-seek because I wanted to avoid censure and get it staged," he said.

"Happy Endings" is more direct. In part, it is an adaptation of "Peculiar Chris," a gay-themed 1992 novel written by a Singaporean, Johann Lee. The book deals with a gay man's coming of age, his first loves and his eventual decision to leave Singapore, where his sexuality makes him a criminal.

McKellen, who was in "Lord of the Rings" and "X-Men," saw "Happy Endings" in Singapore while on tour with the Royal Shakespeare Company. "It seemed to be talking about a situation I recognized in my own life, even though here it was, set on the other side of the world," McKellen said.

"The play does have a strong point of view, but it doesn't only argue one side of the issue and time and again you're having, as you watch it, to adjust your thoughts and answer the point that is being made," McKellen said. "It doesn't just shoot its opinion at you."

He said seeing the play made him feel that he was witnessing "a really important part of Singapore's social history."

A survey in May by a local newspaper found that 62 percent of "heartlanders" - Singaporeans living in public housing, a majority of the population - thought homosexuality should not be legalized.

But Ivan Heng, the director of "Happy Endings," said the question was badly phrased.

"The question was whether gay sexuality was acceptable and not whether homosexuals should be put in jail," he said. "There is a big difference here. Of course, the majority of the population is conservative and will reply accordingly, but that doesn't mean they want to see gay people in jails."

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/02/world/asia/02iht-singapore.1.6955415.html

Sharon

10s13

Homosexuality is a form of Human Rights

California's Proposition 8 (Same-Sex Marriage)

Updated: 11 Jan 2010

Proposition 8 was a 2008 California ballot measure that outlawed same-sex marriage. It continues to be one of the central battlefields in the fight over same-sex marriage in the United States.

On May 15, 2008, the Supreme Court of California voted 4-to-3 that a state law banning same-sex marriage constituted illegal discrimination because domestic partnerships were not a good enough substitute. In its decision, the court wrote that whatever term is used by the state must be granted to all couples who meet its requirements, whatever their gender. The court left open the possibility that another term could denote state-sanctioned unions so long as that term was used across the board.

Opponents quickly organized, and launched the Proposition 8 initiative campaign, asking voters to ban same-sex marriages. After an expensive and hard-fought campaign, the measure passed on Nov. 4, 2008, with 52 percent of the vote. (Florida and Arizona also passed bans at the same time.)

Groups who had fought Proposition 8 immediately filed suit to block it. On May 26, 2009 the state Supreme Court upheld the voter-approved ban but also decided that the estimated 18,000 gay couples who tied the knot before the law took effect will stay wed.

Efforts to overturn Proposition 8 with another ballot measure in California face uncertain prospects, with most major groups having decided to wait until at least 2012 to go back to the voters.

Meanwhile, proponents of same-sex marriage are challenging Proposition 8 in federal court, in a case that is being anxiously watched by gay rights groups and supporters of traditional marriage nationwide. The challenge is being led in court by David Boies and Theodore B. Olson, who represented opposite sides arguing the fate of the 2000 election.


Source: NYTimes



A Basic Civil Right

10 June 2010


After a nearly three-week trial in January, and a lengthy hiatus while lawyers fought over documents, closing arguments are scheduled for Wednesday in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Proposition 8, California’s ban on same-sex marriage.

No one expects the ruling from Judge Vaughn Walker in Federal District Court to be the last word. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, will have its say, and so, eventually, may the Supreme Court.

The testimony made abundantly clear that excluding same-sex couples from marriage exacts a grievous toll on gay people and their families. Domestic partnerships are a woefully inadequate substitute.

On the witness stand, the plaintiffs described the pain and stigma of having their relationships relegated by the state to a lesser category that fails to convey the love and commitment inherent in marriage. “My state is supposed to protect me. It’s not supposed to discriminate against me,” said Paul Katami, one of the plaintiffs.

Defenders of Proposition 8 produced no evidence to back up their claim that marriage between same-sex couples would hurt heterosexual marriage. “I don’t know. I don’t know,” the defense attorney, Charles Cooper, said when asked for an explanation by the judge at a pretrial hearing.

The defense called only two witnesses. The first, Kenneth Miller, a professor at Claremont McKenna College, argued that gay people are a powerful political force, which was meant to support the claim that there is no need for enhanced judicial protection. He ended up admitting that gay men and lesbians suffer discrimination.

The other witness, David Blankenhorn, the president of the Institute for American Values, argued that marriage is being weakened by rising divorce rates and more unmarried people having children, but he could not convincingly explain what the genders of married couples had to do with that.

Upon questioning, he acknowledged that marriage is a “public good” that would benefit same-sex couples and their children, and that to allow same-sex marriage “would be a victory for the worthy ideas of tolerance and inclusion.” The net result was to reinforce the sense that Proposition 8 was driven by animus rather than any evidence of concrete harm to heterosexual marriages or society at large.

It’s not possible to know whether the final ruling in this case will broadly confront the overarching denial of equal protection and due process created by prohibiting one segment of society from entering into marriage. The Supreme Court has, in different cases, called marriage “essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men” and a “basic civil right.”

The result, even if a win for gay couples, could be a limited ruling confined to the situation in California, where the state’s highest court granted the freedom to marry and voters later repealed it following an ugly campaign spearheaded by antigay religious interests.

But there are actions that can be taken now. States like New York should not put off acting on legislation to legalize same-sex marriage. Last week, President Obama extended a modest package of benefits — including day care and relocation allowances — to all partners of federal employees. Congress has a duty to extend to same-sex partners the rest of the benefits that are enjoyed by federal workers whose spouses are of a different sex. It also needs to repeal the 1996 law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

Human Rights Human Rights Advocacy in Africa

Nelson Mandela and the Rainbow of Culture

by Anders Hallengren
11 September 2001

introduction

Equality and Pluralism

After 27 years in prison, Nelson Mandela negotiated the dismantling of the apartheid regime in South Africa, settled an agreement on universal suffrage and democratic elections, and became the first black president of the country in 1994. When he entered into office, he was aware of the universal importance of this success, but he was also humbled by the focus on his person as a symbol of international and historical dimensions. After all, during the years 1952-1990, he had made only three public appearances, and numerous people of different nations had contributed to the cause. Indeed, Africa had been liberated from colonialism during his prison years. The truth of the ancient Bantu adage umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu (we are people through other people) often came to his mind. And he saw, perhaps clearer than most of his contemporaries, the inevitability of "mutual interdependence" in the human condition, that "the common ground is greater and more enduring than the differences that divide." The background of the development of this vision is remarkable and diverse. From his African heritage, from his country's turbulent history, from his own formal education in "colonial" schools, and from his vicissitudes in the confines of Robben Island, Mandela emerged a man with a singular vision.

prison cell
Solitary confinement. Mandela's prison cell in the Robben Island penitentiary.
Photo: Anders Hallengren


The Development of "Colour-blindness"

Starting his fight for liberation of the blacks as an aggressive young African pugilist and nationalist in the early 1940's, Mandela had not always deemed that democratic progress must rest on equality, pluralism, and multiethnicity. What made him later stand out from other South African leaders, and made him finally emerge victorious, was precisely his vision of a state that belongs equally to all its different peoples, nations, and tribes, whether Afrikaan, English, or Zulu. Being himself a leader belonging to the Xhosa-speaking people, he eventually transcended the idea of national liberty, and he attracted Indians, Jews, and other segments of the multicoloured population to the cause. Countering the racist suppression of the blacks, he avoided, unlike many other revolutionaries of the continent, acceding to a basically or exclusively black or tribal liberation movement.

This vision, sometimes referred to as "colour-blindness," was partly inspired by Marxists, drawing on European ideologies and influenced from abroad. They were internationalists, not nationalists, and fought for a class, not for a race. The South African Communist Party, originally founded in 1920, and the kernel of which was a small group of Jewish immigrants and English nonconformists, was to influence the African National Congress (ANC) in such a direction, without ever succeeding in turning Nelson Mandela, Oliver Tambo, and other leaders into members of their party. This influence was theoretical and ideological, based on reading, hearsay, and revolutionary tradition. Through the years, it also became increasingly economic, in terms of financial support from parts of the communist, the socialist, and the social-democratic world — including Sweden, Norway, and India as well as the USSR. Mandela's party, the ANC, was completely pragmatic in its views of material means, however. It accepted succour and aid wherever it came from, whether from Libya (as it happens, one of Mandela's grandchildren was baptized "Gadaffi"), Iraq, diamond investors, or multinational corporations, sticking to its cause and never deviating from its course. The Sotho maxim "many rills make a big river" often was in Mandela's mind. As a matter of fact, and quite contrary to contemporary European and American views, Nelson Mandela and the ANC remained ideologically independent while their financial dependence grew. Nevertheless, as a result of this focus and political imbalance, the ANC became a pawn in great-power politics, which delayed Mandela's release and peaceful reform in South Africa until the winding-up of the Eastern bloc in 1989-90.

Nelson Mandela
Transcending the idea of national liberty.
Courtesy of UWC-Robben Island Mayibuye Archives


The Legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Nehru

Another source of transnational perspectives and ideas of coexistence in harmony was the likewise oppressed Indian population of South Africa, many of whom traced their origin from the indentured labourers shipped to local sugar cane fields by the British colonial authorities. The confidence and faith of contemporary Indian freedom fighters rested upon the belief in the Satyagraha (truth-power) preached and put into effect by Mahatma Gandhi, a vision that had freed India in 1947. The vision of Gandhi was kept alive and thrived in South Africa, where Gandhi himself had lived and worked for many years (1893-1914). Nelson Mandela's early encounters with these more peaceful Hindu, as well as Moslem, activists and their ideologies of emancipation seriously complicated his view of African liberation, and a close bond between the ANC and South Africa's Indian population developed over time. This personal encounter with other people's liberation movements in South Africa, eventually – almost of necessity, as it were – made the ANC leadership turn multicultural and multireligious, bound together by a common goal and based on that "common ground" Mandela often refers to.

When the present writer attended a function where Nelson Mandela received The Gandhi/King Award for Non-violence in 1999, the prize was presented by Ms. Ela Gandhi, granddaughter of Mahatma Gandhi and member of the South African Parliament. She described Mandela as "the man who completed the anti-colonial movement began by Mahatma Gandhi" and, indeed, "the living legacy of Mahatma Gandhi; the Gandhi of South Africa". Furthermore, India on 16 March 2001 conferred The International Gandhi Peace Prize on Nelson Mandela at a grand ceremony at the presidential palace in New Delhi. "In honouring Mandela," President Shri K.R. Narayanan said, "we are paying tribute to an unusual hero in the Gandhian mould, who personifies the triumph of the human spirit over forces of oppression." In his acceptance speech, Mandela recalled India's support to South Africa during the years of struggle against apartheid.

Penetrating even deeper into historical memory, Mohandas Karamchant Gandhi's speech in Johannesburg in 1908 makes us aware of the persistent dream that propelled a progressive movement and is as yet to come true on a universal basis. On that occasion, Gandhi for the first time expressed his dream of a free South Africa, a vision that was to echo throughout the century:

"If we look into the future [of South Africa], is it not a heritage we have to leave to posterity, that all the different races commingle and produce a civilisation that perhaps the world has not yet seen?"

This speech is quoted in Gandhi and South Africa 1914-1948, a collection of articles edited by E.S. Reddy and Gopalkrishna Gandhi, published in India with the dedication "To Nelson Mandela and His Colleagues". In that book, Gandhiji is in fact mentioned as "South Africa's Gift to India." M.K. Gandhi, Attorney in South Africa, was in a deep sense succeeded by Nelson Mandela, Johannesburg Attorney. Or, as Nelson Mandela said in September 1992, when he had been released from prison and democratic reform was on the agenda:

"Gandhiji was a South African and his memory deserves to be cherished now and in post-apartheid South Africa. We must never lose sight of the fact that the Gandhian philosophy may be a key to human survival in the twenty-first century."

Manilal Gandhi, the son of Mahatma, remained in his father's house in Natal, South Africa, and the Indian reform movement encouraged the chaotic but awakening civil disobedience campaigns shaking large parts of South Africa in the early 1950's, in particular the Defiance Campaign of 1952, where the internal passport laws and other apartheid measures were challenged. These originally Indian-inspired peaceful resistance initiatives were met by violence, and the movements gradually turned underground, where they eventually grew. Finally the ANC reacted by building a military command, the Umkhonto we Sizwe ("Spear of the Nation"), preparing itself for guerrilla war. Contrary to Gandhi, and unlike the ANC leader Albert Lutuli, who received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1960, or Archbishop Desmund Tutu, Peace Prize Laureate of 1984, Nelson Mandela long felt forced to advocate unavoidable revolutionary violence, considering it as a counter-violence or a justified uprising against iniquitous laws. Mandela eventually dressed himself in camouflage uniform and was in combat training abroad (in Ethiopia), as were many other revolutionaries. Banned by the South African regime from attending public gatherings from late 1952 on, he nevertheless had efficiently and ingeniously continued his work as an organiser through undercover actions, escaping the police in ever-changing disguises, one of the favourites being that of a chauffeur. The years before his final imprisonment in 1962, he was nicknamed "The Black Pimpernel."

Still, the Indian heritage of peaceful resistance was present in Mandela's mind, and one of his closest fellow-combatants and conspirators was the Indian Ahmed Kathrada, with whom he was to spend a quarter of a century in jail. Among Mandela's models and teachers, however, Jawaharlal Nehru – more militant than Gandhi and a politician of a practical turn - had become the prominent figure.

We should recall that his Indian friends evoked Mandela's interest in India at the time when that state was in the process of being liberated from British colonialism. Nehru, who in 1947 became the first Prime Minister of India, had for two decades urged the Indians in South Africa to join forces with the black Africans, and India was the first country to introduce sanctions against the apartheid regime. One of Mandela's most famous phrases and book titles, No Easy Walk to Freedom, was a quote from Nehru, whose hardships and determination he identified with. While in jail, Mandela was greatly encouraged by receiving the Indian Nehru Prize of 1979, and in his speech of thanks - in his absence read in New Delhi by the exiled Oliver Tambo - he emphasized his indebtedness to Nehru. Their fates were similar, too. When later on speaking of his release from prison, Nelson Mandela said: "I was helped when preparing for my release by the biography of Pandit Nehru, who wrote of what happens when you leave jail. My daughter Zinzi says that she grew up without a father, who, when he returned, became a father of the nation."


The Ancient African Source of Wisdom

The deeper basis for the development of Mandela's universal vision and his confidence was his faith in education. More than everything else, Mandela emphasized education as important for his understanding, as well as for the growth of his people and the development of humanity in general. Furthermore, and consequently, he championed the availability of information and learning to all people. Part of his own peculiar schooling for life was, he points out, his long imprisonment as well as the ancient traditions of the Thembu people and his early years in missionary schools. If we venture to approach "the Making of Mandela," the script that develops is his lifelong education, in a deep and singular way combining the core of African and European traditions.

Born in 1918 in the little village of Mvezo in Qunu in southern Transkei, as the son of the chief Gadla Henry Mphakanyiswa, Rolihlahla Mandela was the great-grandson of Ngubengcuka, the glorious king of the Thembu people who had died in 1832 before British occupation of the territory. Mandela's clan, the Madiba, considered itself as dethroned royalty. The upbringing of the son was accordingly, and when his father died, the Thembu ruler Jongintaba and his wife No-England took care of the boy's education.

house
The house where Mandela was born, in the Transkei district.
Courtesy of UWC-Robben Island Mayibuye Archives

A central concept in this Xhosa-speaking culture, as in Bantu tradition in general, is Ubuntu, fraternity. This implies compassion and open-mindedness and is opposed to individualism and egotism. Nelson Mandela learned how the belligerent and ruthless foreign occupants had destroyed the ancient peace and harmony that reigned among the different Xhosa tribes in the past. The effect was his persistent longing for the reestablishment of precolonial concord, the renaissance of the golden age of Africa. Accordingly, Mandela was always to prefer his clan name, Madiba, as his personal name. When he helped form the ANC Youth League in the Bantu Men's Social Centre in Johannesburg 1944, the manifesto underscored that the African, in contrast to the white man, regards the universe as an organic whole in progress towards harmony, where individual parts exist only as aspects of this universal unity. There is continuity in this emphasis and in this African heritage, since the essence of the concept ubuntu was to recur and be expanded on in the new South African Constitution of 1996.

On the other hand, his mother Nosekeni Fanny had become a devout Christian and sent him to a missionary primary school (where he was given the English name Nelson). As a result, he was introduced and initiated into African teachings and traditions by his regal mentor, while at the same time he was the first ever in his family to attend the local Methodist school. His education had become pronouncedly Afro-European.


Learning the Western Canon

The Methodist schools not only inspired the temperance and discipline of Mandela's lifestyle but proved to be a training ground for liberation, even more so when he moved on to the Clarkebury School, which had been founded in 1825 under the rule of his ancestor king Ngubengcuka. Without these schools for Africans, there would have been neither transfer of power nor any black presidency, Mandela has pointed out.

He advanced to the all-British Healdtown High School, where the principal was a descendant of Lord Wellington, and then to the South African Native College at Fort Hare. There he encountered teachers who made an impression for life: Prof. Z.K. Matthews, the first black pupil to graduate from the college and a relative of Mandela; and the headmaster Alexander Kerr, who drilled the students in English literature. Matthews was to produce the ANC Freedom Charter. Kerr made the pupils see the relevance of classical European literature in a contemporary African context and got Mandela and his classmates to quote English poets wherever they went. Mandela was forever to praise his teachers, and these school experiences are part and parcel of the stress on education in the ANC Program of Action of 1949, which, in its basic aims, established the educational means and the cultural ends of liberation:

— To unite the cultural with the educational and national struggle;
— To establish a national academy of arts and sciences.

After Healdtown followed studies in law and social sciences at Witwaterstand University in 1943-49. These were never officially finished but were taken up again when, as with some other prisoners, he was later allowed to study through correspondence at the University of South Africa and, in 1980, at London University. In fact, the real school for life started when he was arrested in 1962, and indeed this is literally true, since he spent the next thirty years studying and teaching.


Robben Island University

Capetown seen from the Nelson Mandela Gateway to Robben Island.
Photo: Anders Hallengren

Robben Island became a campus for political prisoners. They had to work outdoors in an isolated lime quarry, where, when left to themselves in mine shafts, they discussed their different views and taught each other what they knew, year after year. Mandela wanted the spirit of a university to reign, and regular lectures were arranged in secrecy. Thus, the prison would be called 'The Robben Island University' or later, 'Nelson Mandela University'. From debates with prisoners and white warders through the years, Mandela grew to a widened ideological awareness from which he would draw when arguing with the government on a new South African constitution. In particular, he studied Afrikaans and learnt to understand the mind-set of the Boer minority through discussions with warders and staff. Mandela identified with these descendants of Dutch seventeenth-century immigrants and saw that he himself, under other circumstances, could have taken views similar to theirs. And he always appreciated their fight against the English in the Boer War, which seemed partly to parallel and herald his own fight against oppression. From this understanding, Mandela's remarkable spirit of reconciliation was drawn, when Africans and Afrikaners finally formed a coalition government.

Mandela saw historical connections in all present events, and he knew that the British had imprisoned Xhosa chiefs at Robben Island already in the early nineteenth century. These ancestors and predecessors, first and foremost among them the ruler Makanna, whose warriors had almost conquered the English at Grahamstown in 1819, made him feel the long and strong line behind him, pressing and urging him onwards.

Xhosa chiefs

Xhosa chiefs imprisoned at Robben Island in the 19th century. Apart from the Anglican Church, there was also a leper colony on the island.
Wangermann engraving from 1868 in the South African Library/Robben Island Museum

As times went by, the prisoners found more and more ways of communicating with each other, and the interchange of ideas and knowledge grew. They formed a motley company, where the variety proved to be a great asset to them all. There was the famous South African poet Dennis Brutus, a constant source of inspiration. There were the most foul-mouthed felons as well as an intellectual elite. As important as the presence of African culture, however, was the society of dead English poets.


Shakespeare the Revolutionary

If Africa was the source of their illumination, European literature served as a propelling dynamo for their nerve. Of particular pertinence was William Shakespeare, who was constantly quoted and discussed. Were they not wronged and deceived by a criminal ruler as had been Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark? The subject is of a treacherous Macbeth, and like Macbeth was not the South African regime doomed to destruction? Or, were they not rightfully conspiring against a despotic Julius Caesar? Did not the future rest upon them? Did they really have the guts to shoulder their responsibility? Already an ANC Youth League flyer of 1944 had concluded in the summoning words of Julius Caesar:

The fault ... is not in our stars,
But in ourselves, that we are underlings.

The Bible and Shakespeare: the missionary schools had been effective. The Pan African Congress President Robert Sobukwe had translated Shakespeare's Macbeth into Zulu, just as Tanzania's liberator Julius Nyerere had translated Julius Caesar (for whom he was named) into Swahili. Shakespeare was an active part in the political play. When Harold Macmillan, the conservative premier of England, had delivered a speech in Capetown in 1960, a newspaper cartoon pictured him afterwards with a caption picked from Julius Caesar:

O! pardon me, thou bleeding piece of earth,
That I am meek and gentle with these butchers.

Mandela, who always forgave but never forgot, was to refer to this political cartoon when he spoke in London in 1996. In jail, Mandela's extraordinary memory was a mine, and to him, Shakespeare was The Writer. While in custody, a subject of debate could be whether George Bernard Shaw could measure up to Shakespeare. When Mandela was waiting for the final verdict after the extended legal proceedings, and was prepared to be sentenced to death, Shakespeare's counsel in Measure for Measure was a source of courage:

Be absolute for death; either death or life
Shall thereby be the sweeter.

Unlike the Bible, the Quran, the Bhagavadgita, or Das Kapital by Karl Marx, Shakespeare was a common denominator for the prisoners at Robben Island. Only a few of them were Christian believers; a few were Moslems or Hindus; a few, communists; and their origins were different. They all knew Shakespeare, however. Furthermore, from the point of view of the penitentiary authorities, four-hundred-year-old Elizabethan dramas were not considered dangerous reading. But Shakespeare was profoundly political and always had something of acute importance to say. Militant passages drawn from Coriolanus or Henry V excited them, and Julius Caesar stirred them to rebellion. They knew their destiny, and Mandela's favourite passage read:

Cowards die many times before their deaths;
The valiant never taste of death but once.

Free to study classical drama, the prisoners at Robben Island staged a more than two-thousand-year-old Greek tragedy, the Antigone by Sophocles, in which earthly power is challenged with reference to a higher law. In that production, which was presented under lock and key, Mandela played the part of Creon, the tyrant.

quarry The lime quarry at Robben Island where prisoners taught each other, recited poems and presented lectures. Due to the extreme light and dust, most prisoners suffered from "snow blindness". Nelson Mandela had to undergo surgery to restore the lachrymal ducts of his chronically inflamed eyes and to this day is blinded by flashlights.
Photo: Anders Hallengren

In fact, Mandela began thinking of political organization in terms of dramaturgy. In late June 1976, he noted: "It is often desirable for one not to describe events, but to put the reader in the atmosphere in which the whole drama was played out right inside the theatre, so that he can see with his own eyes the actual stage, all the actors and their costumes, follow their movements, listen to what they say and sing, and to study the facial expressions and the spontaneous reaction of the audience as the drama unfolds." Thabo Mbeki, Ahmed Kathrada, Walter Sisulu, Neville Alexander, and all the others were inspired by words that clearly expressed their thoughts and notions, and at once these became tools in a revolutionary process and cutting rejoinders on a political scene.


From Henley to Heaney

Another source of encouragement was the words of a Victorian English poet, William Ernest Henley (1849-1903). Decade after decade, the unforgettable lines of the poem Invictus, "unconquerable," were on Mandela's lips:

Out of the night that covers me,
Black as the Pit from pole to pole,
I thank whatever gods may be
For my unconquerable soul.

In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.

Beyond this place of wrath and tears
Looms but the Horror of the shade,
And yet the menace of the years
Finds, and shall find, me unafraid.

It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll,
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.

At Robben Island, Mandela recited this poem and taught other prisoners these defiant lines; reading such words "puts life in you", Mandela says. From the British philosopher Bertrand Russell, who had been jailed for his protests against nuclear weapons, Mandela had drawn the arguments of defiance, when conscience and civil laws do not agree. From the Russian novelist and idealist Lev Tolstoy, Kathrada and Mandela got similar support. At times, they also identified with the endless waiting of the protagonists in Samuel Beckett's play Waiting for Godot.

Prisoners crushing stone at the Robben Island B-Section courtyard.
Courtesy of UWC-Robben Island Mayibuye Archives

This literary heritage came with an awareness of the blackness derived from the same source - an often-discussed paradox: they were fighting foreign rule with foreign maxims. Among Xhosa poets, Mandela's favourite was Krune Mkwayi (Mqhayi), whose haunting lament to the Prince of Wales in 1925 has been translated into English by Robert Mshengu Kavanagh:

You sent us the truth, denied us the truth;
You sent us the life, deprived us of life;
You sent us the light, we sit in the dark,
Shivering, benighted in the bright noonday sun.

They were also heartened by the existence of contemporary South African authors like Nadine Gordimer, a devoted supporter. But when they were released and a new government was formed, in which prisoners were transformed into ministers of state, they still quoted English poetry, such as the lines of the contemporary Nobel Laureate Seamus Heaney:

The longed-for tidal wave
of justice can rise up,
And hope and history rhyme

The Liberation of Faith

In December 1999, the Parliament of the World's Religions assembled for the third time since 1893, this time in Capetown. Mandela, who was scheduled to go to the United States, changed his itinerary, anxious to attend. He considered the event of utmost importance. He also had something he wanted to say. In his concluding speech, delivered on December 5, he pointed out the importance of religion to the liberation of his country and his own indebtedness, countering the propaganda that had for half a century pictured him as a godless infidel:

"In our country, my generation is the product of religious education. We grew up at a time when the government of this country owed its duty only to whites, a minority of less than fifteen percent. They took no interest whatsoever in our education. It was religious institutions, whether Christian, Moslem, Hindu, or Jewish, in the context of our country; they are the people who bought land, who built schools, who employed teachers and paid them. Without church, without religious institutions, I would never have been here today. It was for that reason, that when I was ready to go to the United States on the first of this month, an engagement which had been arranged for quite some time, when my comrade, Ibrahim, told me about this occasion, I said: I will change my own itinerary, so I will have the opportunity of appearing here. But I must also add, that I appreciate the importance of religion. Apart from the background I have given you, you have to have been in a South African jail under apartheid, where you can see a cruelty of human beings to others in a naked form. But it was again religious institutions, Hindus, Moslems, leaders of the Jewish faith, Christians, it was them who gave us the hope that one day, we would come out, we would return. And in prison, the religious institutions, raised funds for our children, who were arrested in thousands and thrown into jail, and many of them one day left prison at a high level of education, because of this support we got from religious institutions. And that is why we so respect religious institutions. And we try as much as we can to read the literature, which outlines the fundamental principles of human behaviour. And, like the Bhagadgita, the Qur'an, the Bible, and other important religious documents. And I say this, so you should understand, that the propaganda that has been made for example about the liberation movement is completely untrue. Because religion was one of the motivating factors in everything that we did."

Mandela also looked onwards. Concerning the prospects of the twenty-first century, he pointed out: "No less than in any other period of history, religion will have a crucial role to play in guiding and inspiring humanity to meet the enormous challenges that we face."


The Rainbow Government

In conclusion, the outlook and horizon of Mandela and his sympathisers, who were to form the ideological centre of the new administration of 1994, was stamped by East and West, by European and Asian, as well as genuine African influences. This eclecticism cohered and interacted with the cultural variety of their country and their different origins, which propelled their joint endeavours. The final outcome was the Rainbow Nation, the most multiethnic government ever formed.

Successfully curbing and harnessing the indlovu ayipatha, the dangerous elephant in the shape of the apartheid regime, the rebels finally reached their goal and settled the dispute between Africans and Afrikaners. In achieving this, Mandela agitated against black domination. He did not argue for a turning back to a glorious African society of bygone times but called for a completely new kind of state, a multiethnic democracy without match, constituted by a manifold of cultures having equal rights.

Thus, the ANC leadership, as reorganized when Mandela was released in 1990 and could officially take on command, consisted of a cross section of races, including seven Indians, seven "Coloureds," and seven whites. Likewise, and in harmony with this, a broad cultural and political basis marked the government of 1994. Ministers of state were blacks, whites, Indians, Coloureds, Muslims, Christians, communists, liberals, conservatives. Apart from three Indian Muslims, there were two Hindus in Mandela's government. Never had such a cabinet been seen in Africa or elsewhere. Many prominent posts were occupied by neither Africans nor by Afrikaners: there were Dullah Omar, Minister of Justice; the Minister of Water Kader Asmal; the Minister of Finance Trevor Manuel... all widening the arch of the rainbow government.

children in native costumes
The rights of the people shall be the same, regardless of race, colour or sex.
Photo: Anders Hallengren

This was the realization of a political program outlined almost half a century earlier. The date can be determined with some certainty. In "The Programme of Action: Statement of Policy Adopted at the ANC Annual Conference 17 December 1949," there is hardly a trace of the future multicultural view. In The Freedom Charter, however, adopted at the Congress of the People, Kliptown, on 26 June 1955, the ideology is emerging:

"The rights of the people shall be the same, regardless of race, colour or sex ... All National Groups Shall have Equal Rights! ... Men and women of all races shall receive equal pay for equal work;"

The idea is explicit but not yet fully developed in Mandela's speech for the defence from the dock at the Rivonia Trial in 1963, where he empasized, "I have fought against white domination and I have fought against black domination. I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony and with equal opportunities." In his speech in Harlem, New York, in June 1990, the recently discharged prisoner repeated these words, adding, "Death to racism! Glory to the sisterhood and brotherhood of peoples throughout the world!" The basic concept of ubuntu had by then been expanded beyond all limits of nation, race, faith and gender.

The deed and document of this ideology is the 1996 Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, one of the most modern and radical in the world regarding human rights. It includes an extensive Bill of Rights (Ch. 2) where the numerous paragraphs on equality stand out, for example, "The state may not unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds, including race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth." In Ch. 1, "Founding Provisions," the official languages are enumerated; all are permitted for national government and provincial government use: "The official languages of the Republic are Sepedi, Sesotho, Setswana, siSwati, Tshivenda, Xitsonga, Afrikaans, English, isiNdebele, isiXhosa and isiZulu."

It also states that the president determines the national anthem of the Republic by proclamation. Such proclamation had already occurred. Today, Nkosi Sikelel' iAfrika, the old song of the revolutionaries, sang by Mandela and his comrades decade after decade, echoes throughout the republic in its chorus of equal tongues. The first line concludes the Preamble of the Constitution:

Nkosi Sikelel' iAfrika
Morena boloka setjhaba sa heso
God se‘n Suid-Afrika
Mudzimu fhatutshedza Afurika
Hosi katekisa Afrika
God bless South Africa.

Educational Goals

The Constitution, which is also supplemented by an Action Plan, stresses the importance of education, mentioning this already in the Bill of Rights:

"Everyone has the right -
a. to a basic education, including adult basic education; and
b. to further education, which the state, through reasonable measures, must make progressively available and accessible."

Again, the Constitution of 1996 can be seen as the fulfilment of the ANC Freedom Charter of 1955:

"All people shall have equal right to use their own languages, and to develop their own folk culture and customs . . . . The aim of education shall be to teach the youth to love their people and their culture, to honour human brotherhood, liberty and peace; Education shall be free, compulsory, universal and equal for all children; Higher education and technical training shall be opened to all by means of state allowances and scholarships awarded on the basis of merit; Adult illiteracy shall be ended by a mass state education plan."

In this spirit, people today may enter The Nelson Mandela Gateway to Robben Island Museum Heritage Services (and its iconic museum building completed in December 2001) and go by boat to the penitentiary which Mandela turned into a university. At Robben Island, we also find the model Robben Island Primary School, a school of integration and international awareness.

primary school
A school where the African past is always present. Robben Island Primary School serves as a model school for integration and international awareness.
Photo: Anders Hallengren


What's in a Name?

Mandela never wanted places and things to be named after him. The few exceptions are schools and educational institutions, such as the Nelson Mandela School of Medicine in Durban and Dr. Nelson Mandela High School in the Western Cape; or, to look abroad, 'Nelson Mandela School' in the German Democratic Republic, founded in 1984, and Nelson Mandela School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs in Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

A significant and very telling feature, however, witnessing his care for the future generations, is the Nelson Mandela Children's Fund, established when President Nelson Mandela pledged one-third of his salary for five years.


Conclusion

Thus, we see how one man's remarkable life has reached its fulfillment and has blossomed into a national vision. Inspired by myriad influences, taking the best from both his native heritage, from the example of foreign freedom movements, and even from the history and literature of his oppressors, Nelson Mandela forged a vision of humanity that encompasses all peoples and that sets the hallmark for the rest of the world.

When the Norwegian Nobel Committee decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 1993 to Nelson R. Mandela and Frederik Willem de Klerk, it was pointed out that their achievement was made by "looking ahead to South African reconciliation instead of back at the deep wounds of the past." The committee also observed that South Africa has been the very symbol of racially conditioned suppression, and that the peaceful termination of the apartheid regime accordingly "points the way to the peaceful resolution of similar deep-rooted conflicts elsewhere in the world."

In his Nobel Lecture, Nelson Mandela referred to the organic world-view expressed already in the manifesto of 1944, calling himself a mere representative of the millions of people across the globe who "recognised that an injury to one is an injury to all;" which is the essence of ubuntu philosophy universally applied.


By Lyndon, Grace, Faidah, Jeremy, Varun
Its a bit complex so requires a lot of analysis and critical and logical thinking on the human right to racial equality specifically that most of us do not place much emphasis on due to its sheer complexity and sensitivity. It also highlights its importance and in the conclusion the importance of human rights as a whole in particular for collective security and peace. Cheers!

Violation of Human Rights




According to Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), The General Assembly recognizes that the inherent dignity and the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, human rights should be protected by the rule of law, friendly relations between nations must be fostered, the peoples of the UN have affirmed their faith in human rights, the dignity and the worth of the human person, the equal rights of men and women and are determined to promote social progress, better standards of life and larger freedom and have promised to promote human rights and a common understanding of these rights.

The Holocaust

  • The systematic, bureaucratic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of approximately six million Jews by the Nazi regime and its collaborators.
  • Began in 1933 when Hilter came to power in Germany and ended in 1945 when the Nazis were defeated by the Allied powers.
  • "Holocaust" is a word of Greek origin meaning "sacrifice by fire."
  • Believed that Germans were "racially superior" and that the Jews, deemed "inferior," were an alien threat to the so-called German racial community.
  • German authorities also targeted other groups because of their perceived "racial inferiority": Roma (Gypsies), the disabled, and some of the Slavic peoples (Poles, Russians, and others).
  • Other groups were persecuted on political, ideological, and behavioral grounds, among them Communists, Socialists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and homosexuals.
Jim Crow Laws

Where: North America

Who were involved: African Americans (Blacks) and the Americans (Whites)

When: 1986

What: Jim Crow Laws coming into effect thus leading to denial of human rights to the African Americans. Jim Crow Laws caused segregation between the blacks and whites.

Public facilities were segregated for the Blacks and Whites. This includes the separation of schools, hospitals and other public institutions. The discrimination was so severe that the blacks could only use amenities of inferior quality designated for them.

“This usually involved whites sitting in the front and blacks sitting nearest to the front had to give up their seats to any whites that were standing.”

“African American people who disobeyed the state's transport segregation policies were arrested and fined. In 1956 African Americans, led by Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks, organised the successful Montgomery Bus Boycott."

Moreover, the African Americas were denied of voting rights, a basic human right. This is so that the Whites remains in control and maintain their power. Poll taxes and literacy tests were imposed to discourage voting by poor blacks and the whites. Many blacks protested but "their voices did not reach the ears of an America deaf to racial injustice".

Done by: Jovee Gan, Belle Kua, Maggie Tan, Jaime Tan, Ooi Shi Yun 10S14

Violation of Human Rights


"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.''

—Article 1 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)
Human rights are "rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled."Proponents of the concept usually assert that all humans are endowed with certain entitlements merely by reason of being human.
Human rights violations occur when any state or non-state actor breaches any part of the UDHR treaty or other international human rights or humanitarian law. Article 39 of the United Nations Charter designates the UN Security Council (or an appointed authority) as the only tribunal that may determine UN human rights violations. Wars of aggression, war crimes and crimes against humanity, including genocide, are breaches of International humanitarian law and represent the most serious of human rights violations.



UNITED - a music video promoting tolerance and peace to young people the world over. The music video, United, was produced for use by educators, law enforcement and youth officials to promote human rights and advocate non-violence amongst young people. Subtitled in 18 languages, its universal message of tolerance and peace has to date reached more than 50 million.



Lyrics:

If U-N-I-T-E-D, the world would be a better place.
As ink pours from pen, pain pours from my heart
Knowing theres kids somewhere that actually starve.
Take the time out, close your eyes and just picture this;
No color, no hate, nemesis, or differences.
TV is filling me with scenes of negativity
But we can control it if we can cooperate willingly,
We came a long way, but we got so much further to go.
Guns kill, but hatred destroys us the most.
And the problem could never be solved you see,
Human Rights, define the word — EQUALITY
If we don't respect and love each other, were just livin' a lie
Because UNITED starts with you and I
You feel me?

Chorus:
U-N-I-T-E-D
A better place this world would be
Were all in this game, can't you see?
Were all a part of this family tree

Chorus repeats

We are born free and equal
Free to walk
And free to talk
Free to dance
Free to jump and free to prance.
Know what I'm sayin'?
Got to keep it together
No matter how bad the weather
It will be alright
Keep it tight
cause we all got our freedom rights
Every day from the night
To the broad daylight
Don't discriminate
Learn to appreciate
So you don't have to imitate
Don't be the one to hate
It's never too late
You got the right to life
Innocent til proven guilty
You can say what you like
You got the right to education
So don't throw it away
Know your human rights
cause it could help you some day

Done by; Tulika, Liyana, Alyssa, Dewi

10A04

violation of human rights in North Korea

Since World War II, the people of Korea have had to deal with much which has troubled their population. Human rights violations in the Communist country of North Korea have caught the attention of the United Nations and many human rights organizations from all over the world.


What is mostly affecting the North Korea population is famine and acute food shortages have led to many deaths which have affected the North Korean population since the middle half of the 1990s. There have been massive immigration attempts into neighboring nations of South Korea and China which has caused a stir among residents of those nations. The country of North Korea has to continue to rely on international aid to feed its 50 percent poor and blighted population which suffers from hunger and malnutrition which numbers into the millions.
North Koreans have been crossing the border into China, many in search of refuge as food security continues to be a daily struggle for one third to one half of all North Koreans.


The food shortages are inextricably linked to the regime itself, in part because food distribution favors the ruling elite and military and is tied to the government’s ongoing broader political and military motivations.


The North Koreans began experiencing a food shortage of increasing severity beginning in the early 1990s, after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the resulting cut-off of economic benefits North Korea had received from the communist bloc. Disastrous floods in the summer of 1995 also plunged the country into a severe famine. By 2005, the WFP estimated that nearly half of North Korea’s 24 million people did not have enough to eat and that more than a third of the population was chronically malnourished.


According to a study published a year ago by the Food and Drug Agricultural Organization. Several million North Korean children suffer the effects of chronic malnutrition. Medical care also is lacking due to the inadequateness doctors, nurses and supplies.
Executions in public are carried out at places where large crowds gather. Public notices are given to schools, farms and enterprises. Families have even been present during executions of their loved ones. The executions are usually carried out by hanging or firing squad as reported by Amnesty International.


Women in the North Korea found it increasingly difficult to find daily necessities for their families and many left their homes in search of food or work, including to China. These North Korea women who cross the border into China fleeing hunger and repression in their homeland frequently fall victim to human traffickers who sell them to Chinese men in search of wives. Almost from the moment they cross the border, refugee women are tapped by marriage brokers and pimps involved in human trafficking.



According to the Polaris Project, human trafficking is “the fastest growing criminal industry in the world”. Marriage brokers provide North Korean women as wives, particularly in the rural areas where the historical preference for male babies has led over time to an acute shortage of marriage-age Chinese women. This is due to the years of the one child policy combined with centuries of disregard for girl-children leading to a literal market for women refugee.


There were no known laws specifically addressing the problem of trafficking in persons, and trafficking of women and young girls into and within China continued to be widely reported. A network of smugglers facilitated this trafficking. Many victims of trafficking, unable to speak Chinese, were held as virtual prisoners, and some were forced to work as prostitutes. Traffickers sometimes abused or physically scarred the victims to prevent them from escaping. Officials facilitated trafficking by accepting bribes to allow individuals to cross the border into China.


If a woman is able to extricate herself from the trade and return to North Korea, she is often treated as a criminal instead of a victim, in many cases being imprisoned and forced to do hard labour. If she finally returns to her village, she is treated as a social pariah, creating heightened vulnerability to re-trafficking.


Freedom of expression is not tolerated. People who have expressed ideas or other opinions contrary to that of the ruling party face extreme punishment. News media is censored and international radio broadcasts is restricted by the Communist North Korean government. Assembly and association which are not authorized will result in severe punishment. The North Korean government labels this as a "collective disturbance".

Torture and ill treatment of prisoners in the labor camps and prisons are reported by a variety of sources. The North Koreans who flea to China are often caught and returned to the North Korean government and pay a heavy price for leaving. Many of them are interrogated and beaten to a pulp. Some die do to lack of proper medical treatment due to many of the beatings and starvation.

Violation of Children Rights in Myanmar

The government in Myanmar distributed diminutive resources to the education of children thus it led to many private institutions springing up. The government did not pay the teachers enough and the cost of school rose as resources were diverted to the army. Only the affluent families could come up with the money for sending their children to school. The situation was so devastating to the extent that teachers eventually did not come to work as the parents could not afford to pay them.

The children did not have access to proper education only but also a lack of health care. Private health care facilities became affordable for only the well-to-do. The child mortality rate rose due to the undercutting of government spending on public health care. Many of the children suffer from malnutrition due to the inefficient health care system.

Child prostitution and trafficking are also major abuses of human rights in Myanmar. Although there are laws which criminalise child prostitution and child pornography, it is still ubiquitous. The number of HIV infection among children has been on the rise due to the increase in child prostitution.

The Burmese army has been conscripting children as young as the age of 14, especially those without a family and are on the streets. These children are stationed at training camps where they are taught to support the military. They are often mistreated and tortured by the military forces when they fall short to comply with their orders.

Religious Minorities in Myanmar

The great majority of the Myanmar’s population follows Theravada Buddhism. However, there are minorities of Christians, Muslims, Hindus, etc.

There was governmental preference in practice (although not in law) for non-Buddhists during the period of British colonial rule and Buddhists since independence of Myanmar. These mostly led to social tensions between the Buddhist majority and the Christian and Muslim minorities.

In Myanmar, the non-Buddhists are discriminated against in the public sector. Thus far, a non-Buddhist brigadier general served in the Government at ministerial level and is the only non-Buddhist known to have held flag rank in the armed forces during the 1990’s.

The Muslims are discouraged by the Government from entering military service. Christian or Muslim military officers who aspire to promote beyond middle ranks are encouraged to convert to Buddhism.

Union Solidarity and Development Association (USDA), a SPDC provided the financial support for the mass organization distributed anti-Islamic booklets throughout the country.

Members of the Muslim Rohingya minority in Arakan State, on the Myanmar’s western coast, continue to experience strict legal, monetary, and communal discrimination. It is required by Myanmar’s highly restrictive citizenship law that citizenship was given to those whose ancestors live on grounds at the start of the British colonial rule. Hence, citizenship status was not permitted to most Rohingyas who lived on land that their ancestors did not reside at the start of the British colonial rule.

In addition, because the Myanmar Government reserves secondary education for citizens only, Rohingya do not have access to state run schools beyond primary education, and are unable to obtain most civil service positions.

In March 1999 and April 2000, the Government forcibly relocated about 200 Buddhist slum dwellers from Dagon Township in Rangoon to Arakan State. This firstly gotten rid of slums in Rangoon, and secondly increased the population of Buddhist citizens in Arakan State. During the year in Rakhine State, the Government opened several "model villages" for Buddhist families displaced from other areas. The Rohingyas already residing in the area had their land taken away with no payment and were forced to participate in construction and maintenance. In addition, they were forced over and over again to build Buddhist pagodas for the new arrivals.

Since 1994, when the pro-government DKBA was organized, there has been armed conflict between the DKBA and the Christian-led KNU. This armed conflict had strong religious overtones. During the mid-1990's, reports were that it was common DKBA practice to torment Christian villagers and kill them if they refused to convert to Buddhism. After the settling down of DKBA to administering the regions that it had taken control of, the DKBA treatment of Christians improved significantly.

Tiananmen Square massacre

The Tiananmen Square massacre was an example of loss of human rights in China. It happened in 1989 where thousands of students who were part of the China’s pro-democracy movement, camped in the Square for seven weeks in late May and early June, refusing to move until their demands for democratic reform were met.

The protests were sparked by the death of a pro-democracy and anti-corruption official, Hu Yaobang, whom protesters wanted to mourn. By the eve of Hu's funeral, 1,000,000 people had gathered at Tiananmen Square. The protests lacked a unified cause or leadership; participants included disillusioned Communist Party of China members and Trotskyists as well as free market reformers, who were generally against the government's authoritarianism and voiced calls for economic change and democratic reform within the structure of the government.

The march began with students who were protesting for the rights to free speech and a free press, and even erected a symbolic Statue of Liberty named the “Goddess of Democracy.” They wanted human rights and freedom, similar to the Americans and the other audiences around the world. However, as the days passed, millions of people from all walks of life joined in, angered by the widespread corruption of the government and calling for democracy.

Even though violence was expected to curb the protest, the ferocity of the attack took many by surprise, bringing condemnation from around the world. This hopeful demonstration came to a sudden and horrifying end. On the night of 3 June and into the early morning hours of 4 June, the army launched an assault on the unarmed civilians in the Square. They stormed the area with tanks and machine guns, firing into the crowd at random. Several hundred civilians have been shot dead by the Chinese army during a bloody military operation to crush a democratic protest in Peking's (Beijing) Tiananmen Square. Tanks rumbled through the capital's streets late on 3 June as the army moved into the square from several directions, randomly firing on unarmed protesters. The injured were rushed to hospital on bicycle rickshaws by frantic residents shocked by the army's sudden and extreme response to the peaceful mass protest.

Hundreds of young students were killed and thousands wounded in the attack. Scenes of brutality and chaos were broadcast from Tiananmen Square, and there were reports of students and civilians being imprisoned in other parts of China. Despite being in a dangerous situation, students were still protesting for democracy and human rights. Amid the panic and confusion, students could be heard shouting “fascists stop killing,” and “down with the government”. At a nearby children’s hospital, operating theatres were filled with casualties with gunshot wounds, many of them were local residents who were not taking part in the protests. At least 30 were killed in two volleys of gunfire, which came without warning. Terrified crowds fled, leaving bodies in the road. Troops continued to search the main Beijing university campus for ringleaders, beating and killing those they suspected of co-ordinating the protests.

The Chinese government attempted at censorship, but the cruel and brutal images broadcasted from Tiananmen Square cannot be erased from the public memory. Few who watched the coverage will never forget the sight of a lone student standing defiantly against a column of army tanks, or soldiers clubbing demonstrators until they were bloody and lifeless, or the panic-stricken faces of the people in the Square. Although the Chinese government would like to strike Tiananmen Square from the record books, television has insured that its lessons will be taught for many years to come


Censorship in China

The 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing have drawn international attention to censorship in China. Watchdog groups say the preexisting monitoring system piles on new restrictions, and the government continues to detain and harass journalists. But the country’s burgeoning economy allows greater diversity in China’s media coverage, and experts say the growing Chinese demand for information is testing a regime that is trying to use media controls in its bid to maintain power.


As China becomes a major player in the global economy, authorities in Beijing are trying to balance the need for more information with their goal of controlling content as a means to maintain power. Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Senior Fellow Elizabeth C. Economy says the Chinese government is in a state of “schizophrenia” about media policy as it “goes back and forth, testing the line, knowing they need press freedom—and the information it provides— but worried about opening the door to the type of freedoms that could lead to the regime’s downfall.” Although President Hu Jintao was expected to be more liberal than his predecessors, his administration has pursued a media policy that involves increased regulations as well as the arrest and prosecution of journalists.


The watchdog group Reporters Without Borders ranked China 163 out of 168 countries in its 2007 index of press freedom. Journalists face harassment and prison terms for violating these rules and revealing classified matter. The government’s monitoring structure promotes an atmosphere of self-censorship; if published materials are deemed dangerous to state security after they appear in the media, the information can then be considered classified and journalists can be prosecuted.


How does China exert media controls?

The Chinese government uses different means of intimidation to control the media and induce journalists to censor themselves rather than risk punishment. Censorship tactics include:

• Dismissals and demotions. One of the most common punishments, say watchdog groups, is to fire or demote editors and journalists who publish articles objectionable to the Communist Party’s Central Propaganda Department (CPD).

• Libel. Government officials occasionally use accusations of libel as a way to intimidate media outlets and publishing houses. Cases range from a journalist charged with libel for writing pieces critical of Communist Party leaders on foreign websites to an author whose book about the extortion of farmers by local officials was banned after one of the officials sued him and his publishing house.

• Fines. In August 2007, China passed the “Emergency Response Law,” which bans the spread of unverified information regarding riots, disasters, and other emergencies. Originally, the law threatened to fine media sources up to $12,500 for violations, but it was redrafted with more ambiguous language before it was passed.

• Closing news outlets. News organizations that cover issues the CPD considers classified face closure. In a 2005 report, the People’s Daily said 338 publications were shut down the previous year for printing “internal” information.

• Imprisonment. China imprisoned twenty-nine journalists in 2007, making it the world’s biggest jailor of reporters for the ninth year running, according to Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).
Almost two-thirds of the jailed reporters were arrested for materials published on the Internet. One incarcerated foreign correspondent, Ching Cheong of Singapore’s Straits Times, was arrested in 2005 while reporting about leaders within the Chinese Communist Party. Cheong was sentenced to five years in prison, plus one year’s deprivation of political rights. His arrest had a chilling effect on press freedom in Hong Kong, where he was based.


How does China control the influence of foreign media?

China requires foreign correspondents to get permission before making reporting trips within the country and reporters often face harassment if they cover delicate issues.As part of its bid to host the 2008 Olympics, China promised to relax constraints and “be open in every aspect to the rest of the country and the whole world.”


In January 2007, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao signed a decree that allows foreign journalists to report without permits before and during the Beijing Games. The decree also allows foreign journalists to interview any individual or organization as long as the interviewee consents. The new guidelines came into effect on January 1, 2007, and lasted through October 27, 2008.But critics accuse China of reneging on its Olympic promise.


The Foreign Correspondents Club of China reports that 180 foreign correspondents were detained, harassed, or attacked in China in 2007 despite the nominally relaxed regulations. In addition, China continues to filter foreign (and domestic) content on the Internet—in many cases using technology provided by U.S. companies such as Yahoo!, Microsoft, and Google.


One of the largest foreign uproars came when Beijing introduced regulations in September 2006 requiring foreign wire services to distribute news through Xinhua instead of selling economic information directly to clients. CFR’s Economy says the restrictions had less to do with media control than with a bid by Xinhua to cut into wire services’ profits. The move was “brazen,” says Dietz, because even as Beijing continues prosecuting journalists who cover controversial social issues, “China knows it cannot afford to tamper with the flow of economic data, and that is where it will receive the most external pressure.” But despite the pressure that foreign groups place on China, experts say that criticism coming from outside China will have little effect on policy.