The Czech Republic has been strongly criticised by Europe's leading human rights body for continuing to surgically castrate male sex offenders.
The Council of Europe said castrations had sometimes been performed without warnings of side effects and on men not capable of making an informed decision.
Those requesting castration feared life in jail if they did not do so, it said.
The Czech government says 94 procedures have been performed in the past 10 years, all in accordance with its laws.
A further 300 Czech men have undergone chemical castration - involving the injection of drugs that suppress the production of male hormones - since 2000, according to government figures.
But the Council of Europe said Czech officials had provided "inexact information" on the numbers of those undergoing the procedures.
'Degrading treatment'
BBC Europe reporter Dominic Hughes says surgical castration - under which part of the testicles is removed - has been abandoned in many other countries because it is not clear whether it is effective in treating sex offenders.
Other countries, including Poland, Italy and France, seeking ways of dealing with violent sex offenders and paedophiles, have investigated using chemical castration methods.
But in the past decade the authorities in the Czech Republic have continued to carry out the surgical procedure, which the Council of Europe's Committee for the Prevention of Torture said amounted to "degrading treatment".
 |
"Surgical castration is a mutilating, irreversible intervention and cannot be considered as a medical necessity in the context of the treatment of sex offenders," the committee said in a report.
"The intervention removes a person's ability to procreate and has serious physical and mental consequences."
"Moreover, given the context in which the intervention is offered, it is questionable whether consent to the option of surgical castration will always be truly free and informed," it added.
The committee said that its members found during a visit to two Czech psychiatric hospitals and two prisons in March and April 2008 that "a situation can easily arise whereby patients or prisoners acquiesce rather than consent, believing that it is the only available option to them to avoid indefinite confinement."
The Czech government, which currently holds the rotating presidency of the European Union, has largely rejected the report, arguing that its procedures conform to its own laws.http://www.radio.cz/en/article/113807
1 comment:
The interesting part is that the article states that the male sex offenders agreed to losing their manhood and having kids in the future rather than going to jail. However i find that it is not believable as men are after all men and they pride their manliness with that particular anatomy. They would be able to deal with the harsh life in prison instead since the government are not forthcoming with much details regarding on the alternatives and how the prisoners are dealt with, it is not surprising that the sex offenders are threatened and punished severely that they are forced to get a castration.
Dealing with sex offenders the way Czech Republic deals with them is not wise as Singapore is dealing with low birth rate. Furthermore, we have to give them a benefit of doubt that they can turn over a new leaf and contribute to the society. They would be able to get married and procreate. Thus by punishing them we would not only affect our future birth rate but not allowing them the second chance as everybody make mistakes, although some more grave than others. It would also prevent them from turning over a new leaf as they would resent the punishment and the system. There is also the possibility that they will turn to other crimes as they could no longer be as before thus crime rates will increase.
Castration is not considered a solution but it could be effective for repeated sex offenders that had been charged more than three times as this indicates that they cannot or are not willing to change. Thus by castrating repeated sex offenders and keeping a close watch on them, it would reduce the crime related offense.
by: afiqah
Post a Comment